An exploratory survey of diagnostic methods for bone quality assessment used by Brazilian dental implant specialists
Identifieur interne : 005447 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 005446; suivant : 005448An exploratory survey of diagnostic methods for bone quality assessment used by Brazilian dental implant specialists
Auteurs : R. F. Ribeiro-Rotta [Brésil] ; A. C. Pereira [Brésil] ; G. H. C. Oliveira [Brésil] ; M. C. M. Freire [Brésil] ; C. R. Leles [Brésil] ; C. Lindh [Suède]Source :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2010-09.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Association européenne.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- American academy, Blackwell publishing, Bone mineral content, Bone quality assessment, Clinical application, Clinical methods, Clinical practice, Cluster analysis, Common categories, Consensus workshop, Conventional radiographs, Dental implant planning, Dental implant specialists, Dental implant treatment, Dental implants, Dental practice, Dentomaxillofac radiol, Diagnostic imaging, Diagnostic methods, European association, Federal university, Further groups, Graphic representation, Hierarchical cluster analysis, Hierarchical cluster analysis icicle plot, Image methods, Imaging, Implant, Implant failure, Implant placement, Implant specialists, Implant treatment, Jawbone quality, Maxillofacial radiology, Measurement units, Occlusal radiography, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Other units, Peak insertion torque, Periapical radiography, Perioperative methods, Radiography, Radiol endod, Sectional imaging, Segmentation levels, Selection criterion, Treatment planning, Trinity college dublin, Unusual methods, Zarb.
- Teeft :
- American academy, Blackwell publishing, Bone mineral content, Bone quality assessment, Clinical application, Clinical methods, Clinical practice, Cluster analysis, Common categories, Consensus workshop, Conventional radiographs, Dental implant planning, Dental implant specialists, Dental implant treatment, Dental implants, Dental practice, Dentomaxillofac radiol, Diagnostic imaging, Diagnostic methods, European association, Federal university, Further groups, Graphic representation, Hierarchical cluster analysis, Hierarchical cluster analysis icicle plot, Image methods, Imaging, Implant, Implant failure, Implant placement, Implant specialists, Implant treatment, Jawbone quality, Maxillofacial radiology, Measurement units, Occlusal radiography, Oral maxillofac implants, Oral pathol, Oral surg, Other units, Peak insertion torque, Periapical radiography, Perioperative methods, Radiography, Radiol endod, Sectional imaging, Segmentation levels, Selection criterion, Treatment planning, Trinity college dublin, Unusual methods, Zarb.
Abstract
Summary Bone quality (BQ) has been described as an important predictor for the outcome of dental implant treatment. It is, however, unclear how this factor is assessed in the dental practice routine. The aim of this study was to investigate what Brazilian dental implant specialists know and understand about BQ, if they include BQ assessments in their treatment planning and which methods they use to assess BQ. A questionnaire was posted to Brazilian dental implant specialists, containing open and closed questions about their knowledge and understanding of BQ assessment, and 221 answered the questionnaire. Data were gathered and methods for BQ assessment were grouped using hierarchical cluster analysis. Answers about BQ knowledge and understanding were categorized into quantity of cortical and marrow bone (n = 72), density (n = 55), type of bone (n = 35), bone height (n = 30), bone thickness (n = 27), primary stability (n = 24) and other less common categories. BQ assessment was judged relevant to be considered a selection criterion for implant treatment. Overall frequency analysis showed that methods were roughly divided into usual (n > 170) and unusual methods (n < 9). Cluster analysis grouped BQ assessment methods into four clusters: unusual methods (DEXA, resonance frequency, Periotest and occlusal radiography), perioperative methods (peak insertion torque and tactile perception), sectional imaging (computed tomography) and plain films (periapical and panoramic radiographs). No consensus on BQ understanding or the clinical application of methods to assess BQ was found in this survey. The selection of methods shows a clear natural grouping from basic to advanced strategies for BQ assessment by Brazilian specialists in dental implants.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02102.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 004D47
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 004D47
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001F51
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 005490
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 005447
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">An exploratory survey of diagnostic methods for bone quality assessment used by Brazilian dental implant specialists</title><author><name sortKey="Ribeiro Otta, R F" sort="Ribeiro Otta, R F" uniqKey="Ribeiro Otta R" first="R. F." last="Ribeiro-Rotta">R. F. Ribeiro-Rotta</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pereira, A C" sort="Pereira, A C" uniqKey="Pereira A" first="A. C." last="Pereira">A. C. Pereira</name></author><author><name sortKey="Oliveira, G H C" sort="Oliveira, G H C" uniqKey="Oliveira G" first="G. H. C." last="Oliveira">G. H. C. Oliveira</name></author><author><name sortKey="Freire, M C M" sort="Freire, M C M" uniqKey="Freire M" first="M. C. M." last="Freire">M. C. M. Freire</name></author><author><name sortKey="Leles, C R" sort="Leles, C R" uniqKey="Leles C" first="C. R." last="Leles">C. R. Leles</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lindh, C" sort="Lindh, C" uniqKey="Lindh C" first="C." last="Lindh">C. Lindh</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:9AC6983D7282E8E5DBE8D848401B734BEC846B7F</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02102.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/9AC6983D7282E8E5DBE8D848401B734BEC846B7F/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">004D47</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">004D47</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">004D47</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001F51</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001F51</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2010:Ribeiro Otta R:an:exploratory:survey</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005490</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">005447</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">005447</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">An exploratory survey of diagnostic methods for bone quality assessment used by Brazilian dental implant specialists</title><author><name sortKey="Ribeiro Otta, R F" sort="Ribeiro Otta, R F" uniqKey="Ribeiro Otta R" first="R. F." last="Ribeiro-Rotta">R. F. Ribeiro-Rotta</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Goiás</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pereira, A C" sort="Pereira, A C" uniqKey="Pereira A" first="A. C." last="Pereira">A. C. Pereira</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Goiás</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Oliveira, G H C" sort="Oliveira, G H C" uniqKey="Oliveira G" first="G. H. C." last="Oliveira">G. H. C. Oliveira</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Goiás</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Freire, M C M" sort="Freire, M C M" uniqKey="Freire M" first="M. C. M." last="Freire">M. C. M. Freire</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Goiás</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Leles, C R" sort="Leles, C R" uniqKey="Leles C" first="C. R." last="Leles">C. R. Leles</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><country xml:lang="fr">Brésil</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Dentistry, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="state">Goiás</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lindh, C" sort="Lindh, C" uniqKey="Lindh C" first="C." last="Lindh">C. Lindh</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Suède</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Malmö</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">37</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="698">698</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="703">703</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">6</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-09">2010-09</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>American academy</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bone mineral content</term><term>Bone quality assessment</term><term>Clinical application</term><term>Clinical methods</term><term>Clinical practice</term><term>Cluster analysis</term><term>Common categories</term><term>Consensus workshop</term><term>Conventional radiographs</term><term>Dental implant planning</term><term>Dental implant specialists</term><term>Dental implant treatment</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental practice</term><term>Dentomaxillofac radiol</term><term>Diagnostic imaging</term><term>Diagnostic methods</term><term>European association</term><term>Federal university</term><term>Further groups</term><term>Graphic representation</term><term>Hierarchical cluster analysis</term><term>Hierarchical cluster analysis icicle plot</term><term>Image methods</term><term>Imaging</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant specialists</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Jawbone quality</term><term>Maxillofacial radiology</term><term>Measurement units</term><term>Occlusal radiography</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Other units</term><term>Peak insertion torque</term><term>Periapical radiography</term><term>Perioperative methods</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Radiol endod</term><term>Sectional imaging</term><term>Segmentation levels</term><term>Selection criterion</term><term>Treatment planning</term><term>Trinity college dublin</term><term>Unusual methods</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>American academy</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>Bone mineral content</term><term>Bone quality assessment</term><term>Clinical application</term><term>Clinical methods</term><term>Clinical practice</term><term>Cluster analysis</term><term>Common categories</term><term>Consensus workshop</term><term>Conventional radiographs</term><term>Dental implant planning</term><term>Dental implant specialists</term><term>Dental implant treatment</term><term>Dental implants</term><term>Dental practice</term><term>Dentomaxillofac radiol</term><term>Diagnostic imaging</term><term>Diagnostic methods</term><term>European association</term><term>Federal university</term><term>Further groups</term><term>Graphic representation</term><term>Hierarchical cluster analysis</term><term>Hierarchical cluster analysis icicle plot</term><term>Image methods</term><term>Imaging</term><term>Implant</term><term>Implant failure</term><term>Implant placement</term><term>Implant specialists</term><term>Implant treatment</term><term>Jawbone quality</term><term>Maxillofacial radiology</term><term>Measurement units</term><term>Occlusal radiography</term><term>Oral maxillofac implants</term><term>Oral pathol</term><term>Oral surg</term><term>Other units</term><term>Peak insertion torque</term><term>Periapical radiography</term><term>Perioperative methods</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Radiol endod</term><term>Sectional imaging</term><term>Segmentation levels</term><term>Selection criterion</term><term>Treatment planning</term><term>Trinity college dublin</term><term>Unusual methods</term><term>Zarb</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Association européenne</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Summary Bone quality (BQ) has been described as an important predictor for the outcome of dental implant treatment. It is, however, unclear how this factor is assessed in the dental practice routine. The aim of this study was to investigate what Brazilian dental implant specialists know and understand about BQ, if they include BQ assessments in their treatment planning and which methods they use to assess BQ. A questionnaire was posted to Brazilian dental implant specialists, containing open and closed questions about their knowledge and understanding of BQ assessment, and 221 answered the questionnaire. Data were gathered and methods for BQ assessment were grouped using hierarchical cluster analysis. Answers about BQ knowledge and understanding were categorized into quantity of cortical and marrow bone (n = 72), density (n = 55), type of bone (n = 35), bone height (n = 30), bone thickness (n = 27), primary stability (n = 24) and other less common categories. BQ assessment was judged relevant to be considered a selection criterion for implant treatment. Overall frequency analysis showed that methods were roughly divided into usual (n > 170) and unusual methods (n < 9). Cluster analysis grouped BQ assessment methods into four clusters: unusual methods (DEXA, resonance frequency, Periotest and occlusal radiography), perioperative methods (peak insertion torque and tactile perception), sectional imaging (computed tomography) and plain films (periapical and panoramic radiographs). No consensus on BQ understanding or the clinical application of methods to assess BQ was found in this survey. The selection of methods shows a clear natural grouping from basic to advanced strategies for BQ assessment by Brazilian specialists in dental implants.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Brésil</li><li>Suède</li></country><region><li>Goiás</li></region></list><tree><country name="Brésil"><region name="Goiás"><name sortKey="Ribeiro Otta, R F" sort="Ribeiro Otta, R F" uniqKey="Ribeiro Otta R" first="R. F." last="Ribeiro-Rotta">R. F. Ribeiro-Rotta</name></region><name sortKey="Freire, M C M" sort="Freire, M C M" uniqKey="Freire M" first="M. C. M." last="Freire">M. C. M. Freire</name><name sortKey="Leles, C R" sort="Leles, C R" uniqKey="Leles C" first="C. R." last="Leles">C. R. Leles</name><name sortKey="Oliveira, G H C" sort="Oliveira, G H C" uniqKey="Oliveira G" first="G. H. C." last="Oliveira">G. H. C. Oliveira</name><name sortKey="Pereira, A C" sort="Pereira, A C" uniqKey="Pereira A" first="A. C." last="Pereira">A. C. Pereira</name></country><country name="Suède"><noRegion><name sortKey="Lindh, C" sort="Lindh, C" uniqKey="Lindh C" first="C." last="Lindh">C. Lindh</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005447 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 005447 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:9AC6983D7282E8E5DBE8D848401B734BEC846B7F
|texte= An exploratory survey of diagnostic methods for bone quality assessment used by Brazilian dental implant specialists
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |